CB-01 ยท Bengaluru
THE PITCH THAT DIED
โ† Back
PLAYER ACTION GUIDE โ€” SELECT YOUR ROLE
๐Ÿ”
Lead Detective
๐Ÿงช
Forensic Analyst
โฑ
Timeline Keeper
๐ŸŽ™
Interrogation Specialist
๐Ÿ’ฐ
Financial Crimes Analyst
๐Ÿ’ป
Digital Evidence Analyst
๐Ÿ“ท
Crime Scene Analyst
โš–๏ธ
Devil's Advocate
Lead Detective
๐Ÿ” LEAD DETECTIVE
Coordinator ยท Final Voice ยท Runs the room
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
01_Case_Brief02_Suspect_Profiles โ€” all suspects
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Read the Case Brief aloud to the entire group โ€” slowly, with weight. Then assign Role Cards. Give everyone 2 minutes of silence to read Suspect Profiles.
FOCUS Case Brief ยท Suspect Profiles
  • Has everyone been assigned a role?
  • Does everyone understand who the suspects are?
  • Is the Auto-Host timer started?
END GOAL Everyone knows the case, their role, and is ready to investigate.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
Call on each role to present their evidence findings. Forensic Analyst goes first. Take notes. Ask probing questions โ€” not accusations, just understanding.
FOCUS Synthesising all evidence reports
  • What does the cause of death tell us about who had physical capability?
  • Which suspect's alibi sounds weakest based on Round 1 evidence?
  • Are there any two pieces of evidence that contradict each other?
END GOAL All evidence is shared. The group understands the basic mechanics of the crime.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
Lead the alibi session. Go through each suspect one by one. For every alibi, ask the group: "Is this confirmed by an independent source, or just claimed?" Track the answers.
FOCUS Running structured alibi review across all suspects
  • Which alibis are confirmed by physical evidence or independent witnesses?
  • Which suspect has the least verified account of their movements?
  • Are we ready to open Pack B, or do we need more discussion?
END GOAL Narrowed to 1โ€“2 suspects. Timeline has been stress-tested.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
Announce Pack B is now open. Give 3 minutes of silence to read. Then call each player to share their Pack B findings. Drive toward a group consensus: culprit, motive, and method โ€” all three, all with evidence.
FOCUS Synthesising Pack B with Pack A to reach conclusion
  • Does Pack B confirm or change our leading theory?
  • Can we now name a culprit AND cite the specific evidence that proves each of: culprit, motive, method?
  • Is anyone still strongly unconvinced?
END GOAL Group can name the killer with evidence for motive and method.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” The Closing Layer 15 min
โ–ธ
Announce Pack C is open. Give 3 minutes of silent reading. Then run a final round โ€” call each player to share what Pack C added or changed. Drive to complete consensus: culprit, motive, method, and the staging of the note. All four must be evidenced before accusations.
FOCUS Pack C evidence ยท Final synthesis across all three packs
  • Does Pack C resolve any outstanding doubts about our primary suspect?
  • Can we now account for every major event from the confrontation to the body being found?
  • Is the group unanimous, or is there a dissenting theory that still needs addressing?
END GOAL Full consensus โ€” culprit, motive, method, and staging โ€” all with cited evidence.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Call silence. No more discussion. Each player fills their Accusation Sheet independently. Collect all sheets before opening the solution. Count the majority verdict and announce it.
FOCUS Collecting accusations ยท Announcing majority vote
  • Has every player submitted their sheet?
  • What is the majority verdict?
END GOAL All accusations submitted. Majority culprit identified.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
Open 10_SEALED_Solution_Reveal.html. Read each section aloud โ€” pause between paragraphs. Let the revelation land. Then read the Debrief at the bottom and facilitate the discussion questions.
FOCUS 10_SEALED_Solution_Reveal.html ยท Scoring ยท Debrief
END GOAL Everyone understands what happened, why, and what they missed.
Forensic Analyst
๐Ÿงช FORENSIC ANALYST
Science ยท Cause of Death ยท Physical Truth
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E01 โ€” Autopsy ReportE02 โ€” Toxicology ReportE13 โ€” Combined Forensics Report
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Listen to the Case Brief. Locate your evidence files in Pack A โ€” usually autopsy reports, toxicology, and physical crime scene evidence. Do not read yet. Just know where they are.
FOCUS Identifying your evidence files before Round 1
  • Where are the autopsy and toxicology reports?
  • What is the officially stated cause of death?
END GOAL You know which files are yours and what the official story claims.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
You present FIRST. Always. Open with: cause of death, estimated time of death, and method. Be precise โ€” state evidence file numbers. Then flag anything that seems inconsistent with the official story.
FOCUS Autopsy ยท Toxicology ยท Physical scene evidence
  • What was the exact cause and time of death?
  • Does the physical condition of the body match the official story?
  • Was the victim capable of voluntary action in their final moments?
  • Is there any substance, injury, or physical detail that doesn't fit a natural or accidental cause?
END GOAL The group understands the medical facts and whether the scene was staged.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
As the Timeline Keeper walks through each alibi, your job is to ask: "Does the physical evidence support or contradict this claim?" If the time of death rules someone out or in โ€” say it clearly.
FOCUS Cross-referencing physical evidence against claimed alibis
  • Does the time of death match any suspect's stated whereabouts?
  • Is there physical evidence that requires close proximity to the victim?
  • Does any alibi break down when checked against your forensic findings?
END GOAL Physical evidence has been used to confirm or eliminate at least one alibi.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
Check if Pack B has any new forensic files โ€” additional lab results, revised reports, or trace evidence. Read them first. Report any changes to your earlier findings immediately.
FOCUS Pack B forensic/physical evidence
  • Does Pack B change or confirm the cause of death?
  • Is there new physical evidence that connects a specific suspect to the crime scene?
  • Does the method now point unambiguously to one person?
END GOAL Physical evidence chain is complete. Method is confirmed.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Forensic Confirmation 15 min
โ–ธ
Read E18 (Ananya's Laptop Forensics). Cross-reference it with E03: the note was created on device ANANYA-CTO-LAPTOP at 21:14, 90 seconds of editing time โ€” before Rohan died. The device that created the note is not the victim's. Present this to the group as the forensic confirmation of staging.
FOCUS E18 ยท E03 (cross-reference timestamps)
  • E18 confirms the note was created on Ananya's laptop at 21:14. E03 shows it was printed at 23:32. What does the 2h18min gap between creation and printing tell us?
  • The editing time was 90 seconds. What does that imply about premeditation?
  • Does Pack C change the forensic chain of evidence in any way?
END GOAL Forensic confirmation that the suicide note was written on the wrong device before the death.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Fill your Accusation Sheet independently. Your strongest field is Method โ€” you own the physical evidence. Cite specific file numbers.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with method backed by specific evidence citations.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
During the reveal, pay attention to whether your forensic read was correct. Was the cause of death what you said? Was the method what you identified? Use the debrief to understand what you missed.
FOCUS Solution accuracy ยท Forensic debrief
Timeline Keeper
โฑ TIMELINE KEEPER
Chronology ยท Alibi Verification ยท The Map of When
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E08 โ€” Building Access LogE05 โ€” Phone RecordsE15 โ€” Cell Tower Analysis
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Open 06_Timeline_Board.html right now. Keep it open throughout the entire game. Your job starts the moment Round 1 begins โ€” every time someone mentions a time, you record it.
FOCUS Opening and preparing the Timeline Board
  • What is the murder window โ€” when did the crime occur?
  • What are the fixed time anchors stated in the Case Brief?
END GOAL Timeline Board is open and you're ready to record from minute one.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
As each player presents evidence, record every timestamp you hear into the Timeline Board. After all reports: read back what you've recorded. Ask: "Does this timeline make sense? Are there any gaps?"
FOCUS Building the master timeline from all evidence reports
  • What confirmed times exist for each suspect?
  • What periods are completely unaccounted for?
  • Who was near the crime scene during the murder window?
END GOAL A working timeline with confirmed entries and visible gaps for all suspects.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
THIS IS YOUR ROUND. You lead. Walk through each suspect row on the Timeline Board. For every claimed alibi: "What evidence confirms this time? Is it an independent source or self-reported?" Mark confirmed, suspicious, or unknown.
FOCUS 06_Timeline_Board.html โ€” leading the alibi review session
  • Which suspect has a gap during the murder window with no independent confirmation?
  • Which alibi is confirmed by the most independent sources?
  • Is there a suspect whose confirmed timeline makes them physically impossible?
END GOAL Every suspect marked as Confirmed / Suspicious / Eliminated on the Timeline Board.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
When Pack B is opened, update the Timeline Board with any new timestamps or access logs. Check: does the new data change anyone's status from Round 2?
FOCUS Updating the timeline with Pack B data
  • Does Pack B introduce a new timestamp that changes someone's opportunity window?
  • Does the updated timeline now definitively place one suspect at the scene?
END GOAL Final timeline complete. At least one suspect's opportunity is confirmed or eliminated by Pack B.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Timeline Locked 15 min
โ–ธ
Add Pack C events to the Timeline Board. E16 (Devendra immunity statement) anchors the gap: Rohan was alive at his desk when Devendra left at 21:03. E17 (financial records) adds the motive context. Lock the complete sequence from confrontation to body discovery.
FOCUS E16 ยท Timeline Board โ€” fill the 21:03โ€“23:00 window
  • E16 confirms Rohan was alive at 21:03. The autopsy gives death at 23:00โ€“23:20. Who had Floor 14 access during that entire window?
  • Is the timeline now complete โ€” can we account for every 30-minute slot from 20:00 to midnight?
  • Does the new timeline change who had opportunity?
END GOAL Complete timeline from first keycard entry to body discovery โ€” no unaccounted gaps.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Fill your Accusation Sheet. Your strongest contribution is the timeline section โ€” you own the chronological proof of who had opportunity.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with timeline-based opportunity clearly cited.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
During the reveal, check how accurate your timeline reconstruction was. Were there timestamps you missed? Did the Pack B timeline data change the case in a way you anticipated?
FOCUS Timeline accuracy check during debrief
Interrogation Specialist
๐ŸŽ™ INTERROGATION SPECIALIST
Inconsistencies ยท Pressure ยท The Weak Point in Every Story
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E09 โ€” Rohan's NotebookE07 โ€” Board Meeting NoticeE03 โ€” Suicide Note Metadata
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Read the Suspect Profiles carefully. Before Round 1 starts, mentally note: who has the vaguest alibi? Who has the most to lose? You're building a target list.
FOCUS 02_Suspect_Profiles.html โ€” initial read for inconsistency signals
  • Which suspect's profile raises the most immediate questions?
  • Who claims an alibi that sounds unverifiable?
END GOAL A mental shortlist of which suspects to pressure in Round 2.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
Listen carefully to every evidence report. Your job: note every statement that contradicts another piece of evidence. Write them down. You're building your Round 2 case file.
FOCUS Cross-referencing claims vs. evidence across all reports
  • Did any suspect claim to be somewhere that physical evidence contradicts?
  • Is there a statement that changed between the initial report and a later one?
  • Which claim is the least supported by independent evidence?
END GOAL A list of specific inconsistencies ready to surface in Round 2.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
Present the two weakest alibis to the group. For each, make the case for why they don't hold up โ€” cite the specific evidence that contradicts them. Be precise, not emotional.
FOCUS Presenting alibi contradictions ยท Challenging the group's assumptions
  • What specific evidence contradicts this suspect's stated location?
  • If this alibi is false, does the timeline now place them at the scene?
  • What would it take to completely confirm or rule this person out?
END GOAL The group has confronted the two weakest alibis with specific contradicting evidence.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
After Pack B is read, identify which piece definitively breaks an alibi. State it clearly: "This piece proves [suspect] could not have been where they claimed." Cite the evidence number.
FOCUS Finding the Pack B alibi-breaker
  • Which Pack B piece most directly contradicts a suspect's claimed story?
  • Is there now enough evidence to state that one specific alibi is impossible?
END GOAL One alibi is definitively broken with Pack B evidence.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Statements Resolved 15 min
โ–ธ
Read E16 (Devendra Kulkarni immunity statement). Reconcile it against E10 (the WhatsApp exchange): Devendra's statement should confirm his role, his contact "Dev" identity, and his exit time. Read E19 (NexPay cooperation file) โ€” it confirms the external party and whether Ananya was the originator or a recruited asset.
FOCUS E16 ยท E19 ยท Reconcile against E10
  • Does Devendra's statement in E16 match what the WhatsApp exchange in E10 implied?
  • E19 reveals NexPay approached Ananya first. Does this change her culpability in your assessment?
  • Are there any remaining unresolved contradictions between suspect statements and physical evidence?
END GOAL Every suspect statement verified or disproved. Devendra's role confirmed as accomplice, not killer.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Fill your Accusation Sheet. Your strongest field is "Key Contradiction" โ€” you've been building toward this the entire game. Cite the specific evidence that makes the alibi impossible.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with a clear, evidence-backed contradiction statement.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
During the reveal, focus on whether you identified the right contradiction. Was the key inconsistency what you thought? What did you miss?
FOCUS Contradiction accuracy check
Financial Crimes Analyst
๐Ÿ’ฐ FINANCIAL CRIMES ANALYST
Money Trails ยท Shell Companies ยท Follow the Motive
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E06 โ€” Financial Intelligence ReportE14 โ€” Board Meeting Minutes
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Identify your financial evidence files in Pack A. Bank statements, company registrations, payment records. Note what the Case Brief says about the victim's business or financial life โ€” that's your starting context.
FOCUS Locating financial evidence files in Pack A
  • What financial context does the Case Brief give?
  • What financial documents are in my evidence set?
END GOAL You know where the money evidence is and what the financial backdrop looks like.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
Present your financial findings. Look for: unusual payment amounts, transfers to unknown accounts, shell companies, documents with addresses that match other evidence. Connect financial data to people.
FOCUS Bank statements ยท Company registrations ยท Payment records
  • Is there a payment trail that leads to one specific suspect?
  • Are there any companies, accounts, or transactions that don't appear legitimate?
  • Does any suspect have a direct financial motive โ€” money gained or threat of money lost?
END GOAL The group understands the financial motive landscape across all suspects.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
As alibis are tested, ask for each suspect: "Does our financial evidence give them a stronger or weaker motive?" Some alibis are perfect โ€” but the financial motive may still make them the most likely actor.
FOCUS Connecting financial motive to opportunity analysis
  • Of our remaining suspects, who has the strongest financial motive backed by evidence?
  • Is there a financial document that places a specific person in a specific position of threat or gain?
END GOAL Financial motive is matched to the suspect with the clearest opportunity.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
Pack B often contains the financial smoking gun โ€” the second document that connects to your Round 1 find. Cross-reference it immediately with what you already have.
FOCUS Pack B financial documents โ€” cross-referencing with Pack A finds
  • Does a Pack B document connect to a financial find from Pack A?
  • Is the motive now fully provable with evidence โ€” not just plausible?
END GOAL Motive is proven by evidence, not just inferred.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Motive Confirmed 15 min
โ–ธ
Read E17 (Ananya's Financial Records) and E19 (NexPay Cooperation File). E17 shows payments received from NexPay into a personal account. E19 reveals NexPay's Singapore registration and the timeline of FraudShield v2 โ€” launched exactly when the API call volume spiked. Present the financial motive to the group.
FOCUS E17 ยท E19 ยท Connect to E11 API call timeline
  • E17 shows payments to Ananya from NexPay. How do the amounts and dates align with the API call history in E11?
  • E19 shows NexPay was incorporated before approaching Ananya. What does that say about the planning involved?
  • Does the financial evidence fully establish motive, or is there still ambiguity?
END GOAL Financial motive fully evidenced โ€” NexPay payments to Ananya confirmed against the IP theft timeline.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Fill your sheet. Your strongest field is Motive โ€” cite the specific financial evidence that proves it. Not "they needed money." Specific: document name, amount, connection to suspect.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with evidence-backed motive statement.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
Check whether you identified the correct financial motive. Did you find the key financial connection, or did Pack B need to complete it for you?
FOCUS Motive accuracy check
Digital Evidence Analyst
๐Ÿ’ป DIGITAL EVIDENCE ANALYST
Phone Records ยท Messages ยท Digital Footprints
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E10 โ€” WhatsApp MessagesE11 โ€” IT Forensics Report
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Identify your digital evidence in Pack A โ€” phone records, call logs, WhatsApp/messages, CCTV access logs, email records. Note who sent what to whom in the final 24 hours.
FOCUS Locating digital/communication evidence files
  • What digital records exist in this case?
  • Which suspects have documented phone or digital activity?
END GOAL You know what communication evidence exists and who it involves.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
Present digital findings. Key questions to answer: where was each suspect's phone during the murder window? What communications happened in the hours before the crime that are significant?
FOCUS Phone records ยท Messages ยท Access logs ยท Digital timestamps
  • Does any phone record place a suspect near the scene despite a conflicting alibi?
  • Is there a message that reveals motive, planning, or guilt?
  • Are there calls or messages that were deleted or conspicuously absent?
END GOAL The group understands what digital evidence confirms or contradicts about each suspect.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
As alibis are tested, use phone tower and access log data to verify or disprove claimed locations. Digital records are often the most objective evidence in the case.
FOCUS Using digital records to verify alibi locations
  • Does phone tower data confirm or contradict where a suspect claims to have been?
  • Is there digital activity from a suspect during a period they claim to have been elsewhere?
END GOAL At least one alibi is strengthened or broken by digital evidence.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
Pack B often contains the critical digital record โ€” the phone tower log, the deleted message, or the access timestamp that breaks the case. This is frequently your smoking gun.
FOCUS Pack B digital records โ€” often the key breakthrough
  • Does Pack B contain a digital record that definitively places someone at the scene?
  • Is there a timestamp that makes one alibi physically impossible?
END GOAL The key digital evidence is identified and communicated to the group.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Digital Chain Complete 15 min
โ–ธ
Read E18 (Ananya's Laptop Forensics). This is the final link: farewell_v2.docx was created on ANANYA-CTO-LAPTOP at 21:14:33, with 90 seconds of editing, before Rohan died. Cross-reference with E03 (print at 23:32 via RDP). The digital chain is now closed โ€” creation device, creation time, print initiation, and print confirmation all documented.
FOCUS E18 ยท Cross-reference E03 RDP session + print timestamp
  • E18 gives device ANANYA-CTO-LAPTOP. E03 gives print source RMEHT-CEO-DESK via RDP. Connect the two.
  • File created at 21:14. Print fired at 23:32. What happened in between?
  • Is there any digital evidence in Pack C that creates doubt, or does everything converge?
END GOAL Complete digital chain: note written on Ananya's device โ†’ remotely printed from victim's computer after death.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Fill your sheet. Cite specific digital evidence โ€” file name, timestamp, what it proves. Digital evidence is objective; use it to anchor your accusation.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with specific digital evidence cited.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
Check whether the digital trail led where you thought. Was the key digital record in Pack A or Pack B? Did phone tower data play out the way you interpreted it?
FOCUS Digital evidence accuracy review
Crime Scene Analyst
๐Ÿ“ท CRIME SCENE ANALYST
Physical Evidence ยท Scene Reconstruction ยท Was It Staged?
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E04 โ€” CCTV Footage LogE12 โ€” CCTV Supplemental Analysis
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Identify your crime scene evidence โ€” photographs, scene reports, physical evidence inventories, CCTV stills. Your central question from the moment the game starts: does the scene match the official story?
FOCUS Locating scene and physical evidence files
  • What physical evidence exists at the scene?
  • What does the official story say happened โ€” and what would that actually look like physically?
END GOAL You know what physical evidence you have and what the scene's official story claims.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
Present your scene findings. The central question: does the physical evidence match an accidental, suicide, or natural death โ€” or does something not fit? Flag every physical detail that seems inconsistent.
FOCUS Scene photos ยท Physical inventory ยท CCTV stills ยท Environmental evidence
  • Does the body position, scene layout, or physical evidence match the official cause of death?
  • Is there evidence of a struggle, staging, or deliberate cleanup?
  • Is there anything present that shouldn't be โ€” or anything missing that should be there?
END GOAL The group knows whether the scene appears staged or consistent with the official story.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
When suspects are discussed, ask: "Does the physical scene evidence require the perpetrator to have specific knowledge, access, or physical capability that limits our suspect list?"
FOCUS Linking scene evidence to suspect capability and access
  • Does the crime method require knowledge or access that only specific suspects have?
  • Does physical evidence narrow down the killer's approximate size, strength, or familiarity with the location?
END GOAL Physical evidence has been used to limit the suspect pool by capability and access.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
Check for any Pack B physical evidence โ€” a found object, a second scene report, trace evidence. The murder weapon or a key physical object often appears in Pack B.
FOCUS Pack B physical evidence โ€” often includes the weapon or key object
  • Does Pack B contain physical evidence that directly connects a suspect to the scene?
  • Is there an object that shouldn't be where it was found โ€” or that was found somewhere that tells a story?
END GOAL Physical connection between suspect and scene is established.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Scene Reconstruction Final 15 min
โ–ธ
Read E16 (Devendra immunity statement โ€” he saw Rohan alive at his desk at 21:03, with a whiskey glass). Read E18 (note written at 21:14 on Ananya's laptop). Now reconstruct the physical sequence in the room: who was where, in what order, and what the scene looked like at the moment of death.
FOCUS E16 ยท E18 ยท Final scene reconstruction
  • E16 places Rohan alive at his desk at 21:03. E02 gives drug ingestion window from 21:50โ€“22:20. Who arrived between those times?
  • Where was the "suicide note" physically in the room, and when was it placed there?
  • Can you now describe the full physical sequence of events on Floor 14 from 20:47 to 23:28?
END GOAL Complete physical reconstruction of the crime scene sequence โ€” from Devendra's exit to Ananya's exit.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Fill your sheet. Your strongest contribution is to the Method field โ€” use physical evidence to describe exactly how the crime was committed. Cite the specific object or scene evidence.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with physically-grounded method description.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
During the reveal, check whether your scene reconstruction was accurate. Was the scene staged in the way you identified? Did you find the key physical evidence or did Pack B need to deliver it?
FOCUS Scene reconstruction accuracy check
Devil's Advocate
โš–๏ธ DEVIL'S ADVOCATE
Challenge Everything ยท Defend the Dismissed ยท Demand Proof
YOUR EVIDENCE THIS CASE
E05 โ€” Phone RecordsE13 โ€” Combined Forensics ReportE15 โ€” Cell Tower Analysis
๐Ÿ“‹
Phase 0
Setup & Briefing 5 min
โ–ธ
Read the Suspect Profiles. Identify the suspect the group is least likely to suspect โ€” usually the one with the weakest apparent motive or a very solid alibi. You'll defend this person until evidence forces you to concede.
FOCUS 02_Suspect_Profiles.html โ€” identifying who the group will dismiss
  • Who is the group most likely to ignore โ€” and why?
  • What is the weakest assumption in the official story?
END GOAL You have a working hypothesis that challenges the most obvious suspect.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Round 1
First Evidence Review 20 min
โ–ธ
After each evidence report, ask one probing question: "What does this evidence actually prove โ€” vs. what are we assuming it proves?" Push the group to distinguish fact from inference.
FOCUS Distinguishing evidence from assumption across all reports
  • What does this evidence definitively prove vs. what is the group inferring?
  • Is there an alternate explanation for this finding that doesn't implicate the obvious suspect?
  • Which piece of evidence has the group accepted too quickly?
END GOAL The group has interrogated at least one assumption they were treating as fact.
โฑ
Round 2
Alibi Testing 20 min
โ–ธ
Actively defend the suspect the group is most ready to dismiss. Make the best possible case for them using existing evidence. Force the group to find positive proof โ€” not just "they had motive and no alibi."
FOCUS Defending the dismissed suspect with evidence
  • What evidence actually points TO the leading suspect โ€” not just what fails to rule them out?
  • Is the group's leading theory based on proof or on the absence of a better explanation?
  • Could the physical evidence support an alternate culprit?
END GOAL The group has been forced to find affirmative proof rather than settling for elimination.
๐Ÿ”“
Round 3
Pack B โ€” The AHA Moment 20 min
โ–ธ
After Pack B is read, reassess your position. If Pack B definitively rules out the person you were defending โ€” concede clearly and state why. If your position is strengthened, say so.
FOCUS Reassessing the devil's advocate position with Pack B evidence
  • Does Pack B confirm or destroy the alternate theory you've been defending?
  • Was there merit to the challenge, even if the conclusion changes?
END GOAL You have either conceded or strengthened your position with Pack B evidence.
๐Ÿ”
Round 4
Pack C โ€” Final Challenge 15 min
โ–ธ
Read all Pack C documents. Your final task: raise every remaining doubt. Does E16 fully clear Devendra โ€” or could he have returned? Does E17 prove Ananya was paid, or could the payments have another explanation? Does E19 introduce a third party with opportunity? Challenge the group's conclusion one last time before accusations are filed.
FOCUS E16 ยท E17 ยท E18 ยท E19 โ€” challenge each against the group's theory
  • Devendra says he didn't know what Ananya was planning. Is that credible given E10?
  • NexPay approached Ananya first (E19). Could the real orchestrator be someone at NexPay, with Ananya as a patsy?
  • Is there any evidence in Pack C that could support an alternative suspect?
END GOAL Every alternative theory has been raised and addressed. The group accuses with full confidence.
๐Ÿ”
Phase 5
Accusation Phase 10 min
โ–ธ
Submit your genuine best theory โ€” not your devil's advocate position. The accusation is real. Fill your sheet based on what the evidence actually shows.
FOCUS 07_Accusation_Sheet.html
END GOAL Sheet submitted with your honest conclusion โ€” devil's advocate mode is off.
๐Ÿ†
Phase 6
Solution & Debrief Open-ended
โ–ธ
During the debrief, your contribution is unique: did the devil's advocate position have genuine merit? Did it help the group think more rigorously, or send them in circles? Be honest.
FOCUS Evaluating the devil's advocate contribution to the group's accuracy