Account Details
| Field | Details |
| Account Name | RM Consultancy Services |
| Account Number | XXXX XXXX 4421 (full number on file with investigating officer) |
| Branch | HDFC Bank β Kothrud Branch, Pune 411 038 |
| Account Type | Current Account |
| Account Opened | 14 August 2023 |
| KYC Signatory | Reena Suresh Mehrotra β PAN on file with bank |
| Records Produced | 1 January 2025 β 9 March 2025 (full statement period) |
Account Statement β Selected Transactions (FebβMar 2025)
RM Consultancy Services
A/C: XXXX-4421 Β· Current Account
Branch: Kothrud, Pune
Statement Period:
1 Feb 2025 β 9 Mar 2025
HDFC Bank
01-Feb-25
Opening Balance: βΉ4,22,800
ββ
24-Feb-25
NEFT CR β HDFC Kothrud β consulting fee
β80,000
28-Feb-25
RTGS CR β Desai & Associates Client A/C β REF: DA/CS/2025/118/DISB-001
β18,00,000
03-Mar-25
NEFT DR β SBI transfer β personal
5,00,000β
07-Mar-25
Account frozen per court order β PPD 2025-0488
ββ
Transaction Analysis β 28 February 2025 Transfer
| Field | Details |
| Transfer Type | RTGS (Real Time Gross Settlement) |
| Originating Account | Desai & Associates β Designated Client Account, HDFC Senapati Bapat Road |
| Receiving Account | RM Consultancy Services β HDFC 4421 |
| Reference | DA/CS/2025/118/DISB-001 |
| Amount | βΉ18,00,000 |
| Authorisation Document | Physical disbursement form β signed "Vikram Desai" β presented to bank by Reena Mehrotra in person at Senapati Bapat Road branch, 27 February 2025 |
CRITICAL DETAIL: The disbursement authorisation form was presented to the bank by Reena Mehrotra in person on 27 February 2025. The signature on the form purports to be that of Vikram Desai. Forensic handwriting comparison of this signature against authenticated specimens from Vikram Desai is documented in E15.
Note on βΉ80,000 Credit β 24 February 2025
The βΉ80,000 credit on 24 February 2025 originates from a Kothrud-area HDFC account. Forensic digital analysis of Reena Mehrotra's email (E17) references a payment of βΉ80,000 "through the usual arrangement" to a Sharma & Partners-linked contact. This transaction is consistent with payment for ghostwriting legal arguments for opposing counsel β a separate Bar Council violation.